Datha D. Burke - Page 7

                                                 - 7 -                                                   
            sold real estate acquired on January 1, 1982, and realized a                                 
            $16,690 gain on the sale.  They reported that their selling price                            
            was $853,086 and that their basis was $836,396.                                              
                  Respondent determined that the North Main property was worth                           
            $250,000 when BEC canceled Mr. Burke's debt, the Walnut property                             
            was worth $262,000 at that time, and BEC paid petitioners                                    
            $925,000 for the properties.  Respondent determined that the                                 
            effect of petitioners' transfer of the properties to BEC was that                            
            petitioners received a $413,000 dividend from BEC, and realized a                            
            capital gain of $430,724.  Respondent determined that $189,574 of                            
            the capital gain was attributable to the Walnut property and                                 
            $241,150 to the North Main property.  Applying the long-term                                 
            capital gains deduction under section 1202 to part of the                                    
            $430,724 capital gain, respondent calculated petitioners' taxable                            
            gain at $348,283, rather than the $16,690 amount that they had                               
            reported on their 1982 tax return.                                                           
                                                OPINION                                                  
                  We must determine whether petitioners failed to report                                 
            income on BEC's cancellation of Mr. Burke's debt.  Petitioners                               
            argue that they did not, relying on the interpretation of                                    
            discharge of indebtedness income set forth in Bowers  v.                                     
            Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U.S. 170 (1926).  Petitioners allege                                
            that they, on behalf of BEC, purchased the Bank Stock, and that                              
            State banking regulators later forced BEC to transfer the stock                              
            to Mr. Burke.  Petitioners allege that BEC recorded a receivable                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011