Cactus Wren Jojoba, Ltd., Cecil R. Almand, Tax Matters Partner - Page 3

                                                 - 3 -                                                   
                  Yuma Mesa Jojoba, Ltd. (Yuma Mesa), is a Texas limited                                 
            partnership to which the TEFRA partnership provisions are                                    
            applicable.  By notice of FPAA respondent determined the                                     
            following adjustments to the partnership return of income of Yuma                            
            Mesa for the taxable year 1982:  (1) Disallowance of $1,298,031                              
            claimed as qualified research and experimental expenditures under                            
            section 174; (2) disallowance of $9,000 claimed as a deduction                               
            for tax counseling fees; and (3) disallowance of $750 claimed as                             
            a deduction for guaranteed payments to partners.  Respondent also                            
            determined in the alternative that, if the research and                                      
            experimentation expenditure were allowed as a deduction, it would                            
            be an item of tax preference under section 57(a)(6).  William                                
            Woodburn (Woodburn), as TMP, timely filed a petition with this                               
            Court.                                                                                       
                  The issue remaining for decision is whether the Yuma Mesa                              
            and Cactus Wren partnerships are entitled to losses for the                                  
            taxable years 1982 and 1983, respectively, resulting from claimed                            
            deductions attributed to research and development expenses.  In                              
            their opening brief, petitioners make an alternative argument                                
            that the partnerships are entitled to an abandonment loss under                              
            section 165 for 1987.  The 1987 tax year is not before the Court                             
            with respect to these consolidated cases, and therefore we                                   
            decline to address this issue.                                                               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011