Charles E. Campbell - Page 7

                                                 - 7 -                                                   

                        37.  [Petitioner's] failure to produce any records                               
                  of [his] business or personal activities for respondent                                
                  during the examination of [petitioner's] income tax                                    
                  liabilities for the taxable years 1987, 1988, and 1989                                 
                  was fraudulent with the intent to evade the payment of                                 
                  taxes for each respective year.                                                        
            Petitioner failed to respond to respondent's requests for                                    
            admission as required by Rule 90(c).                                                         
                  At the trial session beginning November 12, 1996, there was                            
            no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner or Ms. Campbell.                                 
            Respondent submitted to the Court a decision document with                                   
            respect to Ms. Campbell and informed the Court that petitioner                               
            remained incarcerated.  Respondent also informed the Court that                              
            petitioner and respondent had reached a basis for settlement,                                
            that a decision document had been sent to petitioner, and that                               
            petitioner had subsequently mailed the decision document back to                             
            respondent, and respondent was awaiting delivery.  Upon                                      
            respondent's request for additional time to await delivery of                                
            decision document, the Court ordered that petitioner's and Ms.                               
            Campbell's cases be severed and that petitioner's case be                                    
            continued with jurisdiction retained.                                                        
                  Petitioner had not in fact mailed the proposed decision                                
            document and settlement computations to respondent.  During late                             
            November and December of 1996, respondent repeatedly attempted to                            
            contact petitioner and Ms. Campbell.  Petitioner did not respond                             
            to respondent's correspondence or phone calls.  Following                                    
            respondent's status report dated January 28, 1997, the Court                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011