Maudella L. Caskey - Page 3

                                                 - 3 -                                                   
            show cause in writing on or before December 23, 1996, why                                    
            respondent's motion should not be granted.  As of March 8, 1997,                             
            petitioner has not responded to the Court's order.                                           
                  On March 7, 1994, petitioner entered a plea of no contest in                           
            the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, located in                              
            Charlotte County, Florida, case number 93-203-CF, to the charge                              
            of first degree grand theft.2  This conviction stems from                                    

                  2The transcript of petitioner's criminal proceeding contains                           
            the following colloquy:                                                                      
                  THE COURT:  Would the State summarize the facts, please.                               
                  MS. HARRINGTON:  Between the 23rd of February of 1990 and                              
            August 25th of 1992, this Defendant was doing business as                                    
            Property Management Services.  Under that corporation, they had a                            
            contract to oversee greenbelt Maintenance in five sections of                                
            Punta Gorda Isles; Sections 16, 18, 20 and 23.  Maintenance was                              
            to be paid for through fees assessed by the Association on each                              
            of these sections.                                                                           
                  Under this contract, the Defendant's responsibility was to                             
            accept bids and submit recommendations for payment to Punta Gorda                            
            Isles when the work was completed. [The Defendant] was fully paid                            
            on a monthly basis for the services under the contract by each of                            
            the five Property Owners Associations.                                                       
                  The investigation conducted by the Charlotte County                                    
            Sheriff's Office revealed that the contractors performed the                                 
            necessary work and then submitted these invoices to [the                                     
            Defendant].  After receipt of the invoices, she would duplicate                              
            the invoices, changing the amount due on the form.  The                                      
            duplicated invoices were then being submitted to the Home Owners                             
            Association with a letter recommending payment.  The invoices                                
            were paid by checks from the appropriate sections where the work                             
            was performed and issued in the name of the contractor.                                      
                  In the beginning when the amounts observed were higher than                            
            the amounts of the bill, the contractors discussed this [the                                 
            Defendant].  She advised them that they wanted her to be paid by                             
            the contractors and that they were to take the difference between                            
                                                                           (continued...)                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011