Charlotte Aircraft Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 9

                                                 - 9 -                                                   
            Section 461(h)(1) modifies the all events test, providing that                               
            “the all events test shall not be treated as met any earlier than                            
            when economic performance with respect to such item occurs”.                                 
            Economic performance with respect to interest occurs as the                                  
            interest cost economically accrues in accordance with the                                    
            principles of relevant provisions of the Code.  Sec. 1.461-4(e),                             
            Income Tax Regs.                                                                             
                  Petitioner presents three basic arguments.  First,                                     
            petitioner asserts that the substance of the disputed transaction                            
            is that of a forward purchase contract and a loan.  Second,                                  
            petitioner contends that the accrued interest due to SPELI was an                            
            unconditional fixed obligation, which satisfied the all events                               
            test for all the taxable years at issue.  Third, petitioner                                  
            argues CATCO's intrinsic ability or inability to satisfy the loan                            
            is irrelevant as to whether the accrued interest is deductible.                              
                  Respondent argues that the underlying substance of the                                 
            transaction is in dispute.  Respondent further contends that a                               
            reasonable inference may be drawn from all of the facts available                            
            that the disputed transaction is a "best efforts" consignment                                
            contract with CATCO serving as a sales agent for either SPELI or                             
            American and that the interest represents a sharing of profits on                            
            resale of the aircraft.  Respondent alternatively argues that                                
            even if petitioner is correct, the facts are not sufficiently                                
            well developed to warrant a finding that the all events test is                              
            satisfied.  Respondent further argues CATCO's ability to pay                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011