Deborah E. Clark - Page 7

                                                 - 7 -                                                   

            personal injuries or sickness".  Section 1.104-1(c), Income Tax                              
            Regs., provides that "The term 'damages received (whether by suit                            
            or agreement)' means an amount received * * * through prosecution                            
            of a legal suit or action based upon tort or tort type rights, or                            
            through a settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such                                  
            prosecution."  In order for damages to be excludable from gross                              
            income under section 104(a)(2), the taxpayer must demonstrate                                
            that:  (1) The underlying cause of action is based upon tort or                              
            tort type rights, and (2) the damages were received on account of                            
            personal injuries or sickness.  Commissioner v. Schleier, 515                                
            U.S. at ___, 115 S. Ct. at 2167.                                                             
                  Where amounts are received pursuant to a settlement                                    
            agreement, the nature of the claim that was the actual basis for                             
            settlement controls whether such amounts are excludable under                                
            section 104(a)(2).  United States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229, 237                                
            (1992).  The critical question is "in lieu of what was the                                   
            settlement amount paid?"  Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396,                              
            406 (1995).                                                                                  
                  The amount received by petitioner pursuant to the settlement                           
            agreement in the case against State Farm was intended to settle                              
            petitioner's claims under title VII of the CRA of 1964.                                      
            Petitioner did not file an individual complaint in that case, and                            
            the settlement agreement does not contain a specific reference to                            
            title VII.  Nevertheless, the surrounding circumstances confirm                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011