Robert T. Cozean - Page 3

                                                 - 3 -                                                   
            litigation costs claimed by petitioner are reasonable.  Sec.                                 
            7430(a)(2), (c)(1).                                                                          
                  Neither party has requested a hearing, and we conclude that                            
            a hearing is not necessary.  Rule 232(a).  Accordingly, we decide                            
            petitioner's motion on the basis of the motion, respondent's                                 
            notice of objection to petitioner's motion, petitioner's reply to                            
            respondent's notice of objection, and affidavits submitted by                                
            petitioner.                                                                                  
                  Respondent issued a notice of deficiency dated June 27,                                
            1995, determining deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax                            
            and accuracy-related penalties as follows:                                                   
                                                         Accuracy-Related Penalties                     
                        Year           Deficiency        Sec. 6662(a)                                    
                        1990            $468,857            $93,771                                      
                        1991              67,269             13,454                                      
                        1992              36,250              7,250                                      
            The adjustments contained in the notice of deficiency relate to                              
            respondent's determination that petitioner failed to report as                               
            income distributions received from Development Southwest                                     
            Investments, Inc., his solely owned S corporation; that                                      
            petitioner failed to report cancellation of indebtedness income                              
            relating to the activities of Double J & T Ranch (J & T), a joint                            
            venture in which petitioner was a member; that petitioner was not                            
            entitled to claimed losses in connection with the activities of J                            
            & T, pursuant to the "at risk" rules of section 465; and that                                
            petitioner was not entitled to capital losses claimed in                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011