-5- Regs. Willful neglect means a conscious, intentional failure to file or reckless indifference. United States v. Boyle, supra at 245. Petitioner was required to file a Federal income tax return for 1992. Sec. 6012. He failed to do so and presented no evidence to prove that his failure to file was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. Accordingly, respondent's determination of the section 6651(a) addition to tax is sustained. Issue 3. Section 6654(a) Addition to Tax Respondent also determined an addition to tax pursuant to section 6654(a) for 1992, asserting that petitioner failed to pay estimated tax. Where payments of tax, either through withholding or by making estimated quarterly tax payments during the course of the year, do not equal the percentage of total liability required under the statute, imposition of the section 6654 addition to tax is mandatory, unless the taxpayer shows that one of several statutory exceptions applies. Sec. 6654; Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 222 (1992); Recklitis v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 874, 913 (1988); Grosshandler v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 1, 20-21 (1980). Petitioner bears the burden of proving qualification for such exception. See Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 304, 319-320 (1982). Although certain amounts were withheld from petitioner's wages, petitioner did not make any estimated tax payments for 1992 and introduced no evidence on this issue. Accordingly, we sustainPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011