Dennis J. and Teresa Deneault - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          admissions, it follows that respondent is entitled to judgment on           
          the pleadings that petitioners are liable for the deficiency in             
          tax for 1991 as set forth in the notice of deficiency.                      
               Respondent also determined that petitioners are liable for             
          the penalty for fraud under section 6663(a) for 1991.  Section              
          6663(a) provides that if any part of the underpayment of tax                
          required to be shown on the return is due to fraud, there shall             
          be added to the tax an amount equal to 75 percent of the portion            
          of the underpayment that is attributable to fraud.                          
          Fraud is defined as an intentional wrongdoing designed to                   
          evade tax believed to be owing.  Zell v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d             
          1139, 1142-1143 (10th Cir. 1985), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-152; Webb           
          v. Commissioner, 394 F.2d 366, 377 (5th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C.              
          Memo. 1966-81, and cases cited therein.  Respondent has the                 
          burden to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence.  Sec.               
          7454(a); Rule 142(b).  Fraud is a question of fact to be resolved           
          upon consideration of the entire record and is never presumed.              
          Estate of Pittard v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 391, 400 (1977).                 
          Respondent's burden of proving fraud can be met by facts deemed             
          admitted pursuant to Rule 37(c).  Doncaster v. Commissioner, 77             
          T.C. 334, 337 (1981); see Marshall v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 267,            
          272-273 (1985).                                                             
          In the instant case, petitioners are deemed to have                         
          admitted, pursuant to Rule 37(c), that they attempted to conceal            
          from respondent the source and amount of the income that                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011