Estate of David J. Dickerson, Deceased, Dorothy Dickerson, Executor and Dorothy Dickerson, et al. - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         
          cause is not defined in the Code, the regulations state:  “If the           
          taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence and was              
          nevertheless unable to file the return within the prescribed                
          time, then the delay is due to a reasonable cause.”  Sec.                   
          301.6651-1(c)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  Willful neglect has               
          been defined as a “conscious, intentional failure or reckless               
          indifference.”  United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 245 (1985).           
               In the instant case regarding Michoff, Jr., we have found              
          that he did have income sufficient to require the filing of a               
          return in both the 1986 and 1987 tax years.  The unverified                 
          belief of Michoff, Jr., that he had no taxes owing does not                 
          constitute reasonable cause of the sort that will allow him to              
          escape the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1).  See Olsen             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-432.  We sustain respondent on             
          this issue.                                                                 
          Failure To Pay Estimated Tax                                                
               Respondent determined an addition to tax for failure to pay            
          estimated tax for the 1986 and 1987 tax years for Michoff, Jr.              
          Section 6654 imposes an addition to tax for failure to pay                  
          estimated income tax.  Michoff, Jr., contends that he did not               
          have sufficient income in 1986 or 1987 to require him to pay                
          estimated taxes.  Michoff, Jr., bears the burden of proving that            
          he is not liable for this penalty.  Rule 142(a).  Michoff, Jr.,             
          contends that he had a loss carryover from his business in 1985             
          and, thus, did not have sufficient income in 1986 or 1987 to                
          require him to pay estimated taxes.  Michoff, Jr., offered no               



Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011