Herbert C. Elliot - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
               underlying obligation.  Rude v. Commissioner, 48 T.C.                  
               165 (1967).  This Court will not permit the taxpayer to                
               transform a nondeductible personal obligation into a                   
               deductible corporate debt when to do so would                          
               circumvent the effectiveness of sec. 6672.  But see                    
               First Natl. Bank of Duncanville v. United States, * * *                
               [481 F. Supp. 633 (N.D. Tex. 1979)].                                   
          We hold for respondent on this issue.                                       
          3.  $12,000 and $5,000 Amounts                                              
               Petitioner argues he is entitled to deduct the $12,000 and             
          $5,000 amounts as business bad debts because the deductions arose           
          from actions that he had taken to secure the receipt of his                 
          earnings from EPC.  Respondent concedes that both amounts are               
          deductible as nonbusiness bad debts.                                        
               We agree with respondent.  We have previously addressed and            
          rejected petitioner's claim concerning the $12,000 amount,                  
          holding that he may deduct this amount as a nonbusiness bad debt.           
          For the same reasons that pertain thereto, we hold likewise with            
          respect to the $5,000 amount.  Petitioner has failed to persuade            
          us that he incurred the $5,000 debt for reasons other than                  
          investment.                                                                 
          4.  Applicability of Accuracy-Related Penalty                               
               Respondent determined that petitioner was liable for an                
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for each year                
          because he substantially understated his income tax.  See sec.              
          6662(d).  As applicable herein, section 6662(a) imposes an                  
          accuracy-related penalty equal to 20 percent of the portion of an           
          underpayment that is attributable to substantial understatement.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011