Jack R. and Patricia J. Finnegan - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

               On August 16, 1992, petitioners timely filed their Federal             
          income tax return for 1991 (the original return).  On Schedule C            
          of the original return, Mr. Finnegan listed his principal                   
          business or profession as "Construction Consultant".   In                   
          addition to other income, petitioners reported $16,793.89 in                
          gross receipts from the construction consulting business which              
          consisted of payments from (1) Columbo Construction Co. for work            
          on two elementary schools in Ridgecrest, California, and (2) Hil-           
          Gan Development Corp. for repairing an apartment building in                
          Tustin, California, completing a security gates contract, and               
          managing the apartment building in Tustin, California.  The                 
          original return showed a tax liability of $46,842.82.                       
          Petitioners paid this amount.                                               
               On January 3, 1994, petitioners filed an amended return for            
          1991 (the amended return) which showed a revised tax liability of           
          $27,371.12 and sought a refund of $19,471.70.  On Schedule C of             
          the amended return, which listed Mr. Finnegan's principal                   
          business or profession as "Construction Consultant", petitioners            
          claimed an additional $59,186.95 of expenses (the additional                
          expenses).3  Petitioners incurred all of the additional expenses            

               3  These additional expenses are the result of petitioners'            
          claiming new items or increasing the amount for items claimed on            
          the original return.  Respondent concedes that petitioners                  
          substantiated the following amounts:                                        
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011