Robert Charles Fohrmeister - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          "disregard" includes any careless, reckless, or intentional                 
          disregard.  Sec. 6662(c).  The penalty does not apply to any                
          portion of an underpayment for which there was reasonable cause             
          and with respect to which the taxpayer acted in good faith.  Sec.           
          6664(c).  Generally, the Commissioner's determination imposing              
          the accuracy-related penalty is presumed correct, and taxpayers             
          bear the burden of proving that they are not liable for the                 
          accuracy-related penalty imposed by section 6662(a).  Rule                  
          142(a); Tweeddale v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 501, 505 (1989).                 
               Petitioner has offered no evidence to indicate that he acted           
          with reasonable cause and good faith with respect to some of the            
          issues discussed herein.  Petitioner has failed in his burden to            
          establish that he is not liable for the accuracy-related penalty            
          as it applies to the portion of the deficiency resulting from the           
          disallowed business bad debt deduction, the omitted wage income,            
          and the disallowed casualty loss deduction.                                 
               With respect to the portion of the underpayment resulting              
          from the 10-percent addition to tax imposed by section 72(t), we            
          conclude that petitioner is not liable for the negligence                   
          penalty.  Petitioner reported the distributions from his pension            
          and IRA plans as income on his 1991 Federal income tax return.              
          Petitioner did not report the 10-percent additional tax,                    
          believing that he qualified for the disability exception.                   
          Although petitioner failed to qualify under the technical                   
          provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations, we             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011