Edward J. Frami - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

          was to estimate petitioner's income by starting with an adjusted            
          U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) figure           
          and reducing that amount by the known sources of petitioner's               
          income, such as the Forms 1099 items.                                       
               Respondent's agent, at the time of the reconstruction had              
          only 1991 BLS information and used those amounts and adjusted               
          them by cost of living percentage increases applicable for the              
          years in question.  The agent used three sources of BLS income              
          statistics, including those germane to petitioner's age,                    
          occupation, and geographical location.  The three sources were              
          then totaled and averaged for each year to arrive at the amounts            
          used--$40,984 for 1993 and $42,090 for 1994.  After reduction for           
          petitioner's Forms 1099 income, which was known to respondent and           
          the allowance of a personal exemption and standard deduction,               
          petitioner's taxable income was determined to be $32,192 for 1993           
          and $32,866 for 1994.                                                       
               Petitioner received unemployment compensation for 1993 and             
          he lived without cost in his mother’s home during 1993 and 1994.            
          Petitioner did not pay for meals taken at his mother's home.                
          Petitioner owned and operated automobiles of nominal value during           
          1993 and 1994.  Petitioner's cost of living was below the average           
          due to his life style.  At the time of trial petitioner was not             
          under criminal investigation by the Internal Revenue Service                
          (IRS).                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011