Joseph J. and Lillian A. Gajda - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          there is a genuine issue for trial.  Rule 121(d).  The existence            
          of any reasonable doubt as to the facts will result in denial of            
          the motion for summary judgment.  Hoeme v. Commissioner, 63 T.C.            
          18, 20 (1974).                                                              
               The facts presented below are stated solely for purposes of            
          deciding respondent's motion for summary judgment.                          
          Background                                                                  
               Prior to and during a portion of 1993, petitioner was                  
          employed by International Business Machines Corp. (IBM).  At the            
          time petitioner ceased his employment with IBM, he was over 40              
          years old.                                                                  
               At some time during 1993, petitioner became eligible to                
          participate in the IBM Modified and Extended Individual                     
          Transition Option Program (ITO II Program).  The ITO II Program             
          allows IBM employees to resign or retire early, receiving lump-             
          sum payments and other benefits.  Petitioner was required to sign           
          a General Release and Covenant Not to Sue (the release) as a                
          condition for the sums and benefits, including the lump-sum                 
          payment pursuant to the ITO II program.2   The release is broadly           


          2    Petitioners' counsel has failed to provide respondent with a           
          copy of the release signed by petitioner.  Respondent attached to           
          his memorandum of authorities submitted to this Court a copy of             
          the release used by IBM in the ITO II program.  Petitioner did              
          not contest the submission of the release in petitioner's                   
          response to respondent's motion for summary judgment.  In fact,             
          petitioner refers to the release as if it is the release                    
          petitioner signed.  Thus we treat it as such.                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011