- 2 - generate qualified export receipts the export property must be used in foreign commerce prior to 1 year after its sale. For reasons beyond P's control the vessels were not so used. P contends that the regulation is not a proper interpretation of the statutory provision. Held: Sec. 1.994-1(c)(6), Income Tax Regs., interpreted to require P to reduce gross export receipts by related period costs even though P is permitted to elect to deduct those costs in years prior to the combined taxable income computation. Held, further, P's vessels are not qualified export property because they fail to meet the requirements of sec. 1.993-3(d)(2)(i)(b), Income Tax Regs. Sim-Air, USA, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 187, 190-197 (1992), followed in upholding the validity of the regulation. David C. Bohan, Richard T. Franch, James M. Lynch, Philip A. Stoffregen, David D. Baier, Scott Schaner, Gregory S. Gallopoulos, and Debbie L. Berman, for petitioner in docket No. 19202-94. David C. Bohan, James M. Lynch, Philip A. Stoffregen, and David D. Baier, for petitioner in docket No. 19203-94. William H. Quealy, Jr., Alice M. Harbutte, Jeffrey A. Hatfield, Thomas C. Pliske, and William T. Derick, for respondent. GERBER, Judge: General Dynamics Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries (GENDYN) (docket No. 19202-94) and its foreign sales corporation, General Dynamics Foreign Sales Corp. (GENDYN/FSC) (docket No. 19203-94), are petitioners in these consolidated cases. Respondent determined corporate income tax deficienciesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011