Ted W. Gleave - Page 61

                                       - 61 -                                         
          convinces us that Gleave either kept the $85,000 or used it for             
          his own purposes, and it is income to Gleave.                               
               (c) Key-Man Insurance                                                  
               During the years in issue Kenmore issued at least three                
          checks to Western-Southern Life Insurance Co. as premium payments           
          on an insurance policy on Gleave’s life.  Gleave claims that                
          these premium payments are not income to him, because this policy           
          was a key-man life insurance policy.                                        
               Generally, life insurance premiums paid by an employer on              
          the life of its employee, where the proceeds of the insurance are           
          payable to the employee’s beneficiary, are part of the employee’s           
          gross income.  Section 1.61-2(d)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs.  If            
          the life insurance policy is an asset of the employer, then it              
          may be that the premium payments made by the employer are not               
          income to the employee, even if the employee is also the                    
          employer’s controlling shareholder.  Resolution of this matter              
          involves consideration of various factors.  See, e.g., Casale v.            
          Commissioner, 247 F.2d 440 (2d Cir. 1957), revg. 26 T.C. 1020               
          (1956);16 Centre v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 16 (1970); Lacey v.               
          Commissioner, 41 T.C. 329 (1963); Rev. Rul. 59-184, 1959-1 C.B.             
          65.                                                                         
               The record in the instant cases does not provide us with the           
          information that is necessary to decide whether the life                    


               16   The rationale of the Court of Appeals was accepted by             
          this Court in Centre v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 16, 20 (1970).                




Page:  Previous  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011