-31- 173. Whether a corporation was formed or availed of to avoid tax or has permitted its earnings and profits to accumulate beyond its reasonable needs are questions of fact. United States v. Donruss Co., supra at 307; Helvering v. National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282 (1938); Bremerton Sun Publ'g Co. v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 566, 582 (1965). 2. Burden of Proof Before respondent issued the notice of deficiency in this case, respondent notified petitioner that respondent proposed to issue a notice of deficiency for fiscal years 1987, 1988, and 1989 including a determination that petitioner is liable for accumulated earnings tax under section 531. Petitioner submitted a timely statement under section 534(c) stating the grounds on which it relied to establish that it had not accumulated earnings beyond the reasonable needs of its business. In this statement, petitioner alleged that it had the following grounds for accumulating earnings: (a) Working capital needs, (b) self- insurance (general and product liability), (c) replacement of its herd, (d) replenish/increase herd and animal waste control system, (e) capital improvements, (f) dependence on Winn-Dixie and fears of competition, and (g) herd relocation and land development. In its petition, petitioner asserted that it had two additional grounds for accumulation: stock redemption and retirement of debt.Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011