Joe E. Henry and Carolyn J.Henry - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          financed with nonrecourse notes.  Approximately 7 percent of the            
          sales price of the recyclers sold by ECI Corp. to F&G Corp. was             
          paid in cash with the remainder financed through notes.  These              
          notes provided that 10 percent of the notes were recourse but               
          that the recourse portion of the notes was due only after the               
          nonrecourse portion was paid in full.  The fair market value of a           
          Sentinel EPE Recycler in 1981 was not in excess of $50,000, and             
          the nuts and bolts, or manufacturing cost, was $18,000.  Other              
          recycling machines were commercially available during the years             
          in issue including the Buss-Condux Plastcompactor, Nelmor/Weiss             
          Densification System (Regenolux), Cumberland Granulators, and               
          Foremost Densilator.  Information regarding these other machines            
          was readily available.  PI allegedly sublicensed the recyclers to           
          entities that would use them to recycle plastic scrap.  The                 
          sublicense agreements provided that the end-users would transfer            
          to PI 100 percent of the recycled scrap in exchange for payment             
          from FMEC Corp. based on the quality and amount of recycled                 
          scrap.                                                                      
               Like Clearwater, Sunbelt leased Sentinel EPE Recyclers from            
          F&G Corp. and, as prearranged, licensed those recyclers to FMEC             
          Corp.  The significant transactions of Sunbelt differ from the              
          underlying transactions in Provizer v. Commissioner, supra, only            
          in the following respects:  (1)  The entity that leased the                 
          machines from F&G Corp. and licensed them to FMEC Corp; and (2)             
          the number of machines sold, leased, licensed, and sublicensed.             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011