Albert J. Henry - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         

               Douglas, a certified public accountant, prepared                       
          petitioners' 1982 Federal income tax return.  He was licensed in            
          California and, since 1977, a partner in the firm of Jassoy,                
          Graff & Douglas.  Henry was introduced to Douglas by Hendrickson,           
          who informed him that Douglas was an "excellent, very careful               
          accountant".  Between 1968 and 1974, Douglas worked in the tax              
          department of Price Waterhouse.  While at Price Waterhouse,                 
          Douglas was an instructor in its national tax course. Between               
          1974 and 1977, Douglas practiced with George Peterson & Co.                 
               As petitioners' accountant, Douglas prepared their 1977                
          through 1982 joint Federal income tax returns.  Petitioners'                
          1978, 1979, and 1980 returns were audited by respondent.  Douglas           
          represented petitioners in these audits, which resulted in minor            
          adjustments to petitioners' returns.  Generally, Henry was                  
          satisfied with the manner in which Douglas handled the audits.              
               Henry informed Douglas that IMED had been sold, and that it            
          was Henry's understanding that Monaghan, as IMED's counsel, had             
          structured the stock options as long-term capital gain.  Henry              
          also advised Douglas that if there were any questions regarding             
          the handling of the options to contact Monaghan or Hendrickson.             
               Douglas agreed with his partner, Robert W. Jassoy Jr., that            
          the option proceeds should be classified as long-term capital               
          gain on the income tax returns he prepared for petitioners.  In             
          reaching this decision, Douglas considered as a factor that there           
          were no Forms W-2 or 1099, nor any other form, issued by either             



Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011