- 4 - responsibility for the ongoing examination of petitioners' 1993 income tax return had been reassigned. Ms. Hatley explained that, because of the press of other business, she had not had the opportunity to review the material that petitioners had previously furnished. Ms. Hatley suggested that petitioners write to Ms. Fenton, the "contact person" specified in the notice of deficiency, and request further consideration of their case by Ms. Hatley. By letter dated September 6, 1996, petitioners wrote to Ms. Fenton and requested that their file be transferred to Ms. Hatley for Ms. Hatley's further consideration. The penultimate paragraph of petitioners' letter stated as follows: The basis for this transfer of file is my request and Lana's agreement to a further interview. We believe that she now has all the information she requires in order to perform her audit of 1993 and our meeting will conclude the open issues. Petitioners' request was granted, and Ms. Hatley undertook to consider further petitioners' case. Accordingly, on September 19, 1996, and at Ms. Hatley's request, petitioners faxed various documents to Ms. Hatley for her consideration. Communication between petitioners and Ms. Hatley continued through October 1996. On the basis of their telephone conversation with Ms. Hatley on or before September 6, 1996, as well as Ms. Hatley's agreement to consider further their case, petitioners believed that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011