- 2 - and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: These cases are before the Court on respondent's Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and petitioner's Motions to Restrain Assessment, Levy, Lien, and Collection, as supplemented. The principal issue for decision is whether the Court has jurisdiction over the petitions filed in these cases. Background On June 23, 1995, respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner in which respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal income taxes as follows: Additions to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6654 1989 $54,253 $9,608 $2,173 1990 58,904 9,321 2,884 1991 59,836 9,796 2,425 Also on June 23, 1995, respondent issued a separate notice of deficiency to petitioner in which respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax for 1992 in the amount of $42,608 and additions to tax under sections 6651(a) and 6654(a) in the amounts of $6,901 and $1,122, respectively. Both notices of deficiency were addressed to petitioner at 6001 Knight (...continued) and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011