Shirley S. Hirsh - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

          contentions.  See Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417 (5th Cir. 1984).     
               Section 6673 authorizes this Court to impose a penalty in              
          favor of the United States, in an amount not to exceed $25,000,             
          whenever it appears that the taxpayer's position in a proceeding            
          is frivolous, groundless, or instituted or maintained primarily             
          for delay.  A petition in the Tax Court is frivolous "if it is              
          contrary to established law and unsupported by a reasoned,                  
          colorable argument for change in the law."  Coleman v.                      
          Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986).  In this case,               
          petitioner made frivolous arguments.  She failed to raise any               
          issue with regard to the correct amount of her income tax                   
          liability, including the additions to tax.  Specifically,                   
          petitioner failed to file a petition containing clear and concise           
          statements of error or statements of fact.  Rather, she chose to            
          assert meritless tax protester-type rhetoric that has been                  
          rejected by numerous courts.  Respondent cautioned petitioner, at           
          least once, regarding her arguments and the possibility of a                
          penalty being awarded by this Court if she pursued her baseless             
          claims.  Petitioner also refused to follow this Court's Rules of            
          Practice and Procedure and answer respondent's interrogatories,             
          and failed to cooperate in this case after invoking our                     
          jurisdiction in response to respondent's determination.                     
               We find that petitioner instituted and maintained this                 
          action primarily for delay and that her position in this                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011