Richard D. Hohenstein - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          collecting the proper sum despite having issued a certificate of            
          release.  Section 301.6325-1(a)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.,                 
          states: "In all cases the liability for the payment of the tax              
          continues until satisfaction of the tax in full or until the                
          expiration of the statutory period for collection".                         
          IV. Petitioner's Prayer for Equitable Relief Must Go Unanswered             
               Hohenstein's final argument is a prayer for equitable                  
          relief.  Regrettably for petitioner, this Court is not a court of           
          equity and does not possess general equitable powers.  Stovall v.           
          Commissioner, supra at 149-150 (citing Commissioner v. McCoy, 484           
          U.S. 3 (1987)).  Even a District Court, with equitable powers,              
          cannot disregard statutory terms.  See INS v. Pangilinan, 486               
          U.S. 875, 883 (1988).  Therefore, we find all of petitioner's               
          arguments unavailing and hold that the cash rental arrangement              
          constituted a cessation of qualified use under section                      
          2032A(c)(1)(B), thereby triggering a recapture tax.  See Stovall            
          v. Commissioner, supra at 150.                                              
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for respondent.                               












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  

Last modified: May 25, 2011