Inverworld, Inc., et al. - Page 37

                                       - 37 -                                         
          F.   Additions to Tax                                                       
               In their motion, petitioners elaborate on the arguments                
          which they made on brief regarding the additions to tax assessed            
          against INC and Holdings pursuant to sections 6653 and 6661.                
          Generally, we do not grant reconsideration to resolve arguments             
          which could have been raised during the prior proceedings.  CWT             
          Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. at 1057.  Consequently, we             
          do not reconsider our holdings in our prior opinion sustaining              
          respondent's determination of additions to tax for INC and                  
          Holdings pursuant to sections 6653 and 6661.                                
               We have considered all of the remaining arguments made by              
          petitioners in their motion and find such arguments to be without           
          merit.15  To reflect the foregoing,                                         

                                                  Appropriate orders                  
                                             will be issued.                          






          15   Although not raised by the parties, paragraphs numbered 3              
          and 4 on page 10, paragraph numbered 3.b. on page 221, and                  
          paragraph numbered 3.c. on page 222 in our prior opinion were               
          unnecessary because the matters covered by those paragraphs were            
          covered by the parties in their stipulation and did not require a           
          decision by the Court.  Consequently, in our order to be issued             
          pursuant to this opinion, we will delete those paragraphs from              
          our prior opinion.                                                          






Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  

Last modified: May 25, 2011