- 10 - We discussed at length whether petitioner in fact filed a return for 1986 in our previous opinion regarding respondent's motion for partial summary judgment, Joseph v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-77. We concluded that petitioner did not file a return for 1986, and our discussion does not merit repetition here. Accordingly, respondent's addition to tax under section 6651(a) is sustained.2 Addition to Tax Under Section 6654 Respondent determined an addition to tax under section 6654 for underpayment of individual estimated tax. Petitioner asserts that he is not liable for this addition to tax. Petitioner failed to pay his estimated tax. Accordingly, in light of the foregoing, we sustain the addition to tax.3 For the foregoing reasons, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. 2 This addition, however, must be recomputed taking into account petitioner's allowable business deductions. 3 This addition, however, must be recomputed taking into account petitioner's allowable business deductions.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011