Richard John Kadunc - Page 9

                                                - 9 -                                                 

                  The Court is also convinced that petitioner instituted and                          
            maintained this proceeding primarily, if not exclusively, for                             
            purposes of delay.  Having to deal with this matter wasted the                            
            Court's time, as well as respondent's.  Petitioner, likewise,                             
            wasted his own time.  In view of the foregoing, this Court grants                         
            respondent's request and exercises its discretion under section                           
            6673(a)(1) by requiring petitioner to pay a penalty to the United                         
            States in the amount of $300.  Coleman v. Commissioner, supra at                          
            71-72; Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1418 (5th Cir.                               
            1984); Coulter v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 580, 584-586 (1984);                              
            Abrams v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 403, 408-411 (1984).                                      


                                                           Decision will be entered                  
                                                      for respondent.                                 






















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011