Cheng C. and Susan L. Kao, et al. - Page 5

                                                - 5 -                                                 
            I.  Unreported Income                                                                     
                  Gross income includes all income from whatever source                               
            derived.  Sec. 61(a).  Every taxpayer is required to maintain                             
            adequate records of taxable income.  Sec. 6001.  If a taxpayer                            
            fails to maintain such records, the Commissioner may reconstruct                          
            income in accordance with a method that clearly reflects the full                         
            amount of income received.  Sec. 446(b); Meneguzzo v.                                     
            Commissioner, 43 T.C. 824, 831 (1965).                                                    
                  Respondent used the bank deposits method to reconstruct                             
            petitioners' income for the years in issue.  Bank deposits are                            
            prima facie evidence of income, Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C.                         
            74, 77 (1986), and under the bank deposits method, all money                              
            deposited into a taxpayer's bank account during a given period is                         
            assumed to be taxable income, DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858,                         
            868 (1991), affd. 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992).  Respondent's                               
            determinations are presumed to be correct, and petitioners bear                           
            the burden of proving that respondent's bank deposits analysis is                         
            erroneous.  Rule 142(a); Parks v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 654, 658                          
            (1990).                                                                                   
                  Petitioners contend that the funds deposited into their                             
            accounts are not taxable income.  Their contentions are based                             
            primarily on the testimony of Dr. Kao, Ms. Tu, and Jin Cheng Kao                          
            (Dr. Kao's uncle).  Their testimony, however, was vague, evasive,                         
            and otherwise unpersuasive.  Petitioners, in an attempt to                                
            corroborate this testimony, presented dubious documentation,                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011