George and Kathleen Knevelbaard, et al. - Page 9

                                                - 9 -                                                 

            intentional infliction of emotional distress, (18) negligent                              
            infliction of emotional distress, (19) breach of fiduciary duty,                          
            and (20) constructive fraud.                                                              
                  Causes of action 1 through 10 and 14 through 20 allege that                         
            as a proximate result of the Bank Defendants' wrongful conduct,                           
                  individual MILK PRODUCERS have suffered anxiety,                                    
                  humiliation, worry, mental anguish and emotional and                                
                  physical distress * * * and have been injured in mind                               
                  and body all to their general damage * * *.                                         
            Other injuries alleged were that plaintiffs incurred medical                              
            expenses, were prevented from pursuing normal employment,                                 
            suffered a loss of income and business advantage, and suffered                            
            loss of consortium.                                                                       
                  In the prayer for relief, plaintiffs sought damages for                             
            mental suffering, emotional distress, and loss of consortium in                           
            every cause of action except Nos. 11, 12, and 13.  They also                              
            sought damages for medical and related expenses and for lost                              
            earnings in every cause of action.                                                        
                  The alleged behavior giving rise to the complaint was that                          
            the Bank Defendants made risky loans to Knudsen for the purchase                          
            of Foremost, knowing that both Knudsen and Foremost were highly                           
            leveraged and vulnerable.  As the direct lender, Citicorp took                            
            security interests in all of Knudsen's assets,4 thereby putting                           


                  4     The other Bank Defendants were participants in the loan                       
            (i.e., they bought parts of the loan after it was made) and did                           
            not have direct security interests.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011