- 7 - current proceeding. Specifically, issues that Kochansky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 94-160 (Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals pending) would control would be: a. If total receipts to petitioner's, Richard Kochansky's, trust account from the McNary v. Berghan lawsuit are finally determined to be taxable to petitioner in the above-referenced appealed case they will be additional taxable income to petitioner in this case in the amounts set forth in paragraph 2 of this stipulation. * * * * * * * 10. The Tax Court's final opinion in Kochansky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-160 (Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals pending) shall for all purposes be dispositive of all questions related to the issues in this case, and shall specifically operate as an adjudication on the merits of the settlement issues in this case, and shall specifically operate as an adjudication on the merits of the issues herein to the same extent as would a separate opinion on the merits of the questions related to the issues in this case. 11. A Decision shall be submitted in this case when the Decision in Kochansky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994- 160 (Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals pending) becomes final under I.R.C. � 7481. There are no provisions in the stipulation allowing petitioner to place in issue other legal theories that would exonerate him from liability. Petitioner, however, contends that, on the date the stipulation was filed, which was the date the instant case had been calendared for trial, the Court indicated that petitioner would be entitled to raise "other issues". Specifically, petitioner alleges: 4. On September 26, 1994, at the time and place scheduled for trial in this matter, Special Trial Judge D. Irvin Couvillion stated that the case would be continued in the event that Petitioner desired to raise other issues not before the Court of Appeals. Said statement is a matter ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011