Barbara A. Landreth - Page 4

                                                - 4 -                                                 

                  Since December 1985 and through the date of trial, Mr.                              
            Landreth has paid for health insurance coverage for petitioner                            
            and Kyle.  In addition, Mr. Landreth allowed petitioner to use an                         
            automobile that he owned or controlled.  Mr. Landreth paid Kyle's                         
            private high school tuition.  He contributed to Kyle's checking                           
            account, paid Kyle's credit card bills, and paid for some of                              
            Kyle's vacations.  None of these items were addressed in the                              
            docket sheet entry.                                                                       
                  A supplemental motion for temporary maintenance was filed on                        
            petitioner's behalf by Mr. Buchanan on March 18, 1987.  In the                            
            supplemental motion, petitioner represented that she "previously                          
            filed a motion for temporary maintenance and the court entered                            
            its order granting her $1,800.00 per month".  On June 24, 1987,                           
            Mr. Landreth filed a motion to terminate or reduce "spousal                               
            support".                                                                                 
                  Petitioner and Mr. Landreth lived separate and apart, but                           
            remained married throughout 1991.  During that year, petitioner                           
            received $21,600 (12 monthly payments of $1,800) from Mr.                                 
            Landreth.  On her 1991 Federal income tax return, petitioner did                          
            not include any of the $21,600 she received from Mr. Landreth in                          
            her income.                                                                               
                  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the                         
            $21,600 petitioner received from Mr. Landreth constituted alimony                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011