Woody F. Lemons - Page 57

                                       - 57 -                                         
             phase-in of the disallowance of losses and credits                       
             attributable to interests held on the date of enactment                  
             of section 469, defined as "pre-enactment [interests]" by                
             section 469(m)(3)(B).  Similarly, losses from passive                    
             activities for the taxable year can be offset against the                
             income from passive activities for that year.  See sec.                  
             469(d)(1).                                                               
                  The Forms 8582 filed by petitioners for 1987 claim                  
             a deduction for the portion of petitioners' passive                      
             activity losses attributable to "pre-enactment [interests]"              
             under the phase-in of disallowance rules set forth in                    
             section 469(m).  Similarly, the Forms 8582 filed with                    
             petitioners' 1988 returns suggest that the losses from                   
             certain passive activities were offset by income from other              
             passive activities.  See sec. 469(d)(1).  Respondent's                   
             briefs do not explain why petitioners' ineligibility for                 
             the $25,000 offset for rental real estate activities                     
             provided by section 469(i) is in any way related to the                  
             passive activity losses claimed by petitioners on the                    
             Forms 8582 filed for 1987 and 1988.  We perceive no                      
             connection.  Accordingly, we reject respondent's second                  
             reason for disallowing the partnership losses.                           
                  Respondent's first reason for disallowing the                       
             partnership losses is that petitioner had "insufficient                  






Page:  Previous  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011