- 35 - also claimed a depreciation deduction for their lawn mower and a sprinkler which had no apparent business purpose, for an answering machine when they did not have a business telephone line (they now concede that the answering machine was not depreciable), and for 100 percent of a shed which they now concede was only 25 percent depreciable during 1991 and 50 percent depreciable during 1992. Petitioners have also conceded some deductions they claimed because they were either improper or unsubstantiated. Therefore, we hold that they are liable for the negligence penalty for the above items. We conclude, however, that petitioners made a reasonable attempt to comply with the Code provisions with respect to their model railroad activity, and therefore are not liable for a penalty on that portion of the underpayment for 1990, 1991 or 1992. Sec. 6664(c)(1). In reaching all of our conclusions herein, we have considered all arguments made by petitioners and, to the extent not discussed above, find them to be without merit. To reflect conceded and settled issues and our conclusions with respect to the disputed issues, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Last modified: May 25, 2011