Estate of Mildred Geraldine Letts, Deceased, James P. Letts III and Joanne L. Magbee, Coexecutors - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          surviving spouse the value of property for which no QTIP election           
          was made.  Thus, petitioner contends that the value of the Item             
          II trust is not includable in decedent's gross estate.                      
               Respondent contends that petitioner must include the value             
          of the Item II trust in decedent's gross estate under the duty of           
          consistency.4  For reasons discussed next, we agree with                    
          respondent.                                                                 
          B.   Marital Deduction                                                      
               A tax is imposed on the transfer of the taxable estate of              
          every decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States.           
          Sec. 2001(a).  In computing the value of the taxable estate, an             
          estate may deduct the value of certain interests which pass from            
          the decedent to the decedent's spouse (marital deduction).  Sec.            
          2056(a).  Congress enacted the marital deduction in 1948 and                


               3(...continued)                                                        
                    or all of such property.                                          
                    (c) Property Treated as Having Passed From                        
               Decedent.--For purposes of this chapter and chapter 13,                
               property includible in the gross estate of the decedent                
               under subsection (a) shall be treated as property                      
               passing from the decedent.                                             
               4 Respondent first raised this issue in an amendment to                
          answer filed on Oct. 21, 1996.  Respondent concedes that this               
          issue is new matter under Rule 142(a).  Thus, respondent has the            
          burden of proving that the duty of consistency applies here.                
          Rule 142(a); see Cluck v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 324, 331 n.11              
          (1995).                                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011