L.L. Bean, Inc., Leon Gorman, Tax Matters Person - Page 47

                                       - 47 -                                         
          Building, since it provides access to other parts of the 1986               
          Shipping Building and the 1979 Shipping Building, it is used for            
          the storage and picking of merchandise, and its underside                   
          provides support for electrical and communication cables,                   
          lighting fixtures, sprinkler piping, and ventilation ducts for              
          the first floor of the 1986 Shipping Building.                              
               In determining whether an item is a structural component of            
          a building, the permanency of that component has been considered            
          an important factor.  In Metro Natl. Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1987-38, we considered whether various items in the                   
          taxpayer's buildings were eligible for an ITC.  We found that the           
          structural components listed in section 1.48-1(e)(2), Income Tax            
          Regs., share a common characteristic--reasonable permanency.                
          Furthermore, we stated that "In the ordinary case, a building is            
          planned, designed, and constructed with the expectation that the            
          items listed in the regulation will remain in place indefinitely.           
          They are usually integrated with the building during the                    
          construction phase and are permanent parts of the building."                
               An examination of the evidence in this case indicates that             
          the Mezzanine System is a fully integrated structural component             
          of the 1986 Shipping Building.  The 1986 Shipping Building was              
          planned and designed with the integration of the Mezzanine System           
          in mind.  On this issue, the testimony of petitioner's manager of           
          Facilities, Planning, and Engineering, James R. Helming, is                 
          particularly revealing:                                                     




Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011