John W. Madden, Jr., et al. - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          of the property and the taxpayer's activities with respect to the           
          property are important factors.  See generally Curphey v. Commis-           
          sioner, 73 T.C. 766 (1980).  FGA is substantial, with a capacity            
          to seat 18,000 patrons.  The lease was not a short-term arrange-            
          ment, as it provided for a 6-year initial term.  Further, the               
          Museum was required under the Second Lease to make arrangements             
          for security and parking.   Prior cases make clear that leasing             
          activities of this nature constitute a trade or business that are           
          regularly carried on.  See Ohio County & Indep. Agric. Societies,           
          Delaware County Fair v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-210.                  
               Next, the Museum contends that the leasing activity is                 
          substantially related to its exempt purpose, because the Museum             
          was established to promote live shows and performing arts events.           
          The Museum asserts that it could have put on these productions              
          itself.  Therefore, the Museum argues that it did not generate              
          UBTI by merely leasing FGA and having MCA arrange for the                   
          performances.                                                               
               As discussed supra, an activity is substantially related to            
          an organization's exempt purpose where the activity has a sub-              
          stantial causal relationship with the achievement of the exempt             
          purpose.  Sec. 1.513-1(d)(2), Income Tax Regs.  In evaluating the           
          substantial relationship, we examine the manner in which the                
          Museum conducted its activities in order to determine whether               
          there was an intent to further its exempt purposes or simply make           
          a profit.  United States v. American College of Physicians, supra           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011