- 2 - exclude amounts received in settlement of a class action suit. We hold she is not. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Background The facts have been fully stipulated under Rule 122 and are so found. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in San Francisco, California. In the fall of 1974, petitioner sought the entry-level sales position of trainee agent with State Farm Insurance Co. (State Farm). State Farm's agents discouraged petitioner from pursuing such a position. On June 1, 1979, a class action suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Kraszewski v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.. The plaintiffs in the class action alleged that State Farm, in violation of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), had discriminated against women in the hiring of its insurance agents. On November 6, 1981, the District Court bifurcated the litigation into a liability and a remedy phase. On April 29, 1985, the District Court ruled in the liability phase that State Farm was liable under Title VII for classwidePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011