Charles McHan and Martha McHan - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          was reversed.5  Respondent further contends that, because she               
          disallowed the NOL carrybacks that petitioner claimed for the               
          years in issue, petitioner is required to substantiate the NOL              
          reported in his 1987 tax return notwithstanding whether the                 
          period of limitations for 1987 has expired.  Assuming that                  
          petitioner can substantiate the NOL for 1987, respondent would              
          agree that the NOL accrued no later than December 31, 1987.                 
          Discussion                                                                  
          Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and                     
          avoid unnecessary and expensive trials.  Florida Peach Corp. v.             
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988).  Summary judgment may be             
          granted with respect to all or any part of the legal issues in              
          controversy "if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories,                  
          depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials,                
          together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no                 
          genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be            
          rendered as a matter of law".  Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v.             
          Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th               
          Cir. 1994); Zaentz v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 753, 754 (1988);                
          Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).  The moving                
          party bears the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue            

          5  Respondent also contends that petitioner failed to                       
          properly plead collateral estoppel.  See Rule 39.  To the                   
          contrary, petitioner was granted leave to, and filed an amendment           
          to the petition on Dec. 20, 1996, which includes allegations in             
          support of petitioner's contention that the doctrine of                     
          collateral estoppel is applicable in this case.                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011