Dudley B. and La Donna K. Merkel - Page 24

                                        -24-                                          
          debtors outside of bankruptcy.11  The necessary consequence of              
          that choice is that the nature of the examination to be afforded            
          to obligations claimed to be liabilities for purposes of the                
          statutory insolvency calculation depends on an analytical                   
          framework based on the freeing-of-assets theory and not on the              
          treatment of such obligations in some analogous context, e.g.,              
          “debt” in the bankruptcy context.12                                         
                    5.  Respondent's Plain Meaning Argument                           
               Respondent argues that the term “liabilities” in section               
          108(d)(3) must be given its plain meaning, which requires                   
          excluding contingent liabilities from the statutory insolvency              
          calculation.  As evidence of such exclusive meaning, respondent             
          relies on principles of financial accounting established by the             
          Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).  Respondent asserts            

          11   If Congress were interested primarily in promoting                     
          horizontal equity, Congress could have adopted the more                     
          restrictive approach suggested by the American Law Institute in             
          its Draft of a Federal Income Tax Statute.  See Surrey & Warren,            
          “The Income Tax Project of the American Law Institute:  Gross               
          Income, Deductions, Accounting, Gains and Losses, Cancellation of           
          Indebtedness”, 66 Harv. L. Rev. 761, 817 (1953); see also Fifth             
          Ave.-Fourteenth St. Corp. v. Commissioner, 147 F.2d 453, 457 (2d            
          Cir. 1944) (test based on a hypothetical liquidation of the                 
          debtor), revg. 2 T.C. 516 (1943).                                           
          12   See, e.g., Bankruptcy Code secs. 101(5), 101(12), 726, 727.            
          In addition, adherence to bankruptcy procedures and policies, for           
          example, the estimation of contingent or unliquidated debt                  
          pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sec. 502(c)(1), among other things,             
          would unnecessarily and unjustifiably import unrelated                      
          considerations into the statutory insolvency calculation.  See              
          Bankruptcy Code sec. 502(c)(1) (requiring estimation when the               
          fixing or liquidation of any contingent or unliquidated claim               
          would unduly delay the administration of the bankruptcy                     
          petition).                                                                  



Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011