- 2 - Rules 180, 181, and 183.1 The Court agrees with and adopts the Opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax for the taxable year 1992 in the amount of $2,096 and an addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) in the amount of $519. In contrast, petitioner claims an overpayment in the amount of $352,100. After concessions by petitioner,2 the issues for decision are as follows: (1) Whether respondent may, in determining the deficiency in income tax against petitioner, disregard the community property laws of the State of Arizona; (2) Whether, for purposes of determining the applicable tax rates and standard deduction, petitioner's filing status is that of a married person filing jointly, a married person filing separately, or a head-of-household; (3) whether petitioner is entitled to dependency exemption deductions for her three children; 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 1992, the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 Petitioner concedes that she worked for Sandia Oil Co. and Show Low Gemstones, Inc. in 1992 and received wages during that year from those companies in the amounts of $5,735 and $13,518, respectively.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011