- 8 - petitioner at that address during 1995, and that he was aware that petitioner's parents lived at that address. The postman identified a receipt for certified mail addressed to petitioner at 2407 Lascar Place dated March 25, 1995, and signed for by an unidentified member of the household. The receipt (Postal Service Form 3849) bore the same identifying number as the Postal Service Form 3877 indicating the IRS mailing of the deficiency notice on March 24, 1995, at San Jose, California. The receipt of the certified mail package containing the deficiency notice at the address where petitioner was receiving mail is persuasive evidence establishing actual receipt by petitioner. See Shamam v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-77. Petitioner's suggestion that a child living in the house may have obtained the mail and misplaced it is unconvincing. 3. Failure To File Petition Within Statutory Time Limits For this Court to have jurisdiction, a petition must be filed within 90 days from the date a statutory notice of deficiency is mailed to a taxpayer residing in the United States. Sec. 6213(a). The petition here was mailed on the 91st day and received on the 95th day. The 91st day was not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. On the face of the matter, we lack jurisdiction in this case. Petitioner has attached to his petition a copy of a purported letter dated May 23, 1995, requesting petition forms and also stating: "I wish to contest the IRS determination ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011