- 3 - Petitioners reported income and adjustments to income on their 1992 return as follows: Item of Income Amount Wages $58,796 Interest 630 Dividend 591 Capital gain 36 Other income 1,033 Total income 61,086 Adjustment to Income IRA deduction $2,000 IRA deduction 2,000 4,000 Adjusted gross income 57,086 In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioners were not entitled to the claimed IRA deductions. Respondent determined that each petitioner was an active participant in a pension plan qualified under section 401(a) during 1992. It is well settled that deductions are a matter of legislative grace, and petitioners bear the burden of proving entitlement to any claimed deductions. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); Nelson v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 1151, 1154 (1958). Moreover, respondent's determinations are presumed correct, and it is petitioners' burden to establish error. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Petitioners do not appear to dispute that their respective employers maintained pension plans qualified under sectionPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011