Anthony G. and Shirley A. Olbres - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          1988 (1988 White Star compensation).                                        
               In Schedule B (Interest and Dividend Income) of petitioners'           
          returns for the years at issue, petitioners reported interest               
          income from, inter alia, the Indian Head business savings ac-               
          count.                                                                      
               In Schedule E (Supplemental Income Schedule) of petitioners'           
          returns (Schedule E) for the years at issue, petitioners reported           
          the following amounts of rental income with respect to the                  
          properties indicated:                                                       
                  Year Seabrook Property     North Berwick Property                   
                  1986       $21,600                    *                             
                  1987       30,000                    -0-                            
                  1988       6,000                   $28,000                          
                 *  Although petitioners received $2,925 of rental                    
                 income from Kitchen Tech for the North Berwick                       
                 property, that property was not listed as rental                     
                 property in petitioners' 1986 return.                                
               During 1989, White Star filed its 1988 Form 1120S in which             
          it reported gross receipts of $506,336 and ordinary income of               
          $773.  In Schedule E of their 1988 return, petitioners reported             
          $773 of income with respect to White Star.                                  
               In April 1989, petitioners filed Form 1045 (Application for            
          Tentative Refund) in which they claimed refunds based on an                 
          alleged net operating loss of $52,136 that they carried back from           
          1988 to 1985, 1986, and 1987.  A large portion of that loss was             
          attributable to an alleged casualty loss of $52,002 that peti-              
          tioners claimed with respect to a fire at the Seabrook property             






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011