- 31 - transferred all of its assets to Mrs. Pert after April 15, 1990, the latest date that the claim arose. We conclude that respondent’s claim arose before any of the transfers occurred.5 We conclude that respondent has proven that the claim arose before Mr. Riffe's estate transferred its assets to Mrs. Pert. c. Consideration for Transfers From Mr. Riffe's Estate to Mrs. Pert To establish liability under Fla. Stat. Ann. section 726.106(1) (West 1988), respondent must show that Mr. Riffe's estate did not receive property of a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfers. Mrs. Pert did not pay any consideration to Mr. Riffe's estate for the $399,535 in property that Mr. Riffe's estate transferred to her. Petitioners do not contend that she did. We conclude that respondent has proven that Mr. Riffe's estate did not receive any consideration for the assets it transferred to Mrs. Pert. d. Insolvency or Substantial Indebtedness of Mr. Riffe's Estate Petitioners contend that the estate was solvent when Mrs. Pert deposited the $132,000 in April 1991. A debtor is insolvent under Florida law when the value of his or her debts exceeds the value of his or her assets. Fla. 5Petitioners erroneously interpret the Florida statute to require that the claim had been “made” rather than "arose" before the transfer.Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011