- 2 - to the Court fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. After concessions,2 the remaining issue for decision is whether payments made to petitioner by the City of Oakland during the year in issue pursuant to the Oakland City Charter's retirement provisions for public safety employees are excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(1). We hold that the payments in question are not excludable. The Court bases its findings of fact on the stipulation of facts and attached exhibits, which are incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioner resided in Klamath Falls, Oregon, at the time he filed the petition. Petitioner was born on June 15, 1940. He commenced employment as a member of the Police Department of the City of Oakland, California, on October 31, 1966. He served on active duty until February 16, 1969, on which date he suffered injuries that occurred while he was engaged in the performance of his duties. Effective April 1, 1972, petitioner was retired for disability by reason of these injuries, by action of the Oakland Police and Fire Retirement Board (the Board), which found petitioner's disability to be service connected. As a result of the Board's action, effective 1(...continued) Procedure. 2The parties have stipulated that petitioner is not liable for the addition to tax pursuant to sec. 6651(a).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011