Dennis A. and Tai K. Praegitzer - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          for petitioner Praegitzer, and Richard Bates, counsel for                   
          Ameritech.  At the meeting, petitioner Praegitzer, as corporate             
          president, refused to sign newly issued stock certificates to               
          divide the stock between himself and petitioner Dawes.                      
               At the October 3, 1989, meeting, based on an opinion by Mr.            
          Bates, petitioner Dawes was allowed to vote 2,500 shares of the             
          5,000 shares held in petitioner Praegitzer's name.  By a vote of            
          7,500 in favor to 2,500 opposed, the shareholders amended the               
          corporate by-laws to provide for three directors.  Immediately              
          following the amendment, petitioner Dawes was elected to the                
          board of directors by a vote of 7,500 shares in favor and 2,500             
          shares opposed.                                                             
               An Ameritech directors' meeting was also held on October 3,            
          1989.  Kerry Dawes, petitioner Praegitzer, and petitioner Dawes             
          were present as directors.  Also present were Mr. Lopez, Mr.                
          Small, and Mr. Bates.  By a vote of 2 to 1, Kerry Dawes was                 
          elected president and treasurer, and petitioner Dawes was elected           
          vice president and secretary.                                               
               In November 1989, settlement negotiations occurred between             
          counsel for petitioner Praegitzer and counsel for petitioner                
          Dawes.  Under the circumstances, a 25-percent minority interest             
          was of diminished value to petitioner Praegitzer as it offered no           
          control of Ameritech; the negotiations therefore were designed to           
          restructure the judgment so that either petitioner Praegitzer or            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011