John P. and Carolyn L. Raney - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          construed.  Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. ___,    , 115 S.             
          Ct. 2159, 2163 (1995).                                                      
               Pursuant to section 104(a)(2), gross income does not include           
          "the amount of any damages received (whether by suit or agreement           
          and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of             
          personal injuries or sickness".  The regulations provide that               
          "The term 'damages received (whether by suit or agreement)' means           
          an amount received * * * through prosecution of a legal suit or             
          action based upon tort or tort type rights, or through a                    
          settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution."             
          Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs.  Accordingly, to exclude                  
          damages from gross income pursuant to section 104(a)(2), the                
          taxpayer must establish that:  (1) The underlying cause of action           
          is based upon tort or tort type rights, and (2) the damages were            
          received on account of personal injuries or sickness.                       
          Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. at ___, 115 S. Ct. at 2167.              
               Turning to the first requirement of Commissioner v.                    
          Schleier, supra, we examine whether petitioner's claim was "based           
          upon tort or tort type rights".  Citing United States v. Burke,             
          504 U.S. 229, 237 (1992), respondent argues that petitioner's               
          claim, which arose under title VII, was not based upon tort or              
          tort type rights.  Petitioners, however, argue that petitioner's            
          claim was based upon tort or tort type rights because, as                   
          petitioner was never an employee or trainee of State Farm, the              
          State Farm payment could therefore only represent tort or tort              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011