Benness M. Richards and Jane Richards - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

          interest deduction reported on petitioners' 1978 tax return and             
          denied without qualification the allegation that the notice of              
          deficiency is arbitrary and capricious.                                     
               On January 27, 1987, Luis C. DeCastro, Esq. (Mr. DeCastro),            
          filed an entry of appearance on behalf of petitioners in docket             
          No. 17445-82.  In the interim, on December 23, 1986, respondent's           
          counsel assigned to the Kersting project, Kenneth McWade, Esq.              
          (Mr. McWade), had mailed Mr. DeCastro a letter enclosing proposed           
          decision documents for petitioners and several other taxpayers              
          with cases before the Court involving Kersting-related                      
          adjustments.  On December 30, 1986, Mr. DeCastro executed a                 
          stipulated decision on behalf of petitioners which states that              
          petitioners are liable for a deficiency in income tax for the               
          taxable year 1978 in the amount of $23,000 and that petitioners             
          are not liable for additions to tax under section 6653(a) or                
          6621(d).  On the same date, Mr. DeCastro mailed a check to Mr.              
          McWade, signed by petitioners and made payable to the IRS in the            
          amount of $53,571, representing $23,000 in tax and $30,571 in               
          interest.  Mr. McWade executed the stipulated decision on April             
          27, 1987, and mailed the document to the Court.                             
               On March 30, 1987, Mr. McWade filed a Motion to Sever                  
          petitioners' case from docket No. 17445-82.  Shortly thereafter,            
          the Court granted the motion, severed petitioners' case from                
          docket No. 17445-82, and assigned the case docket No. 8922-87.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011