- 10 - petitioner is liable for the fraud penalty under section 6663 for 1989 and that $28,320 of the underpayment for 1989 was due to fraud. In the memorandum of authorities in support of the motion for summary judgment, respondent conceded that $1,339 of the underpayment for 1989 was not due to fraud. Respondent contends that this amount is due to negligence under section 6662. The deemed admissions establish that petitioner is liable for the negligence penalty as to the $1,339 because petitioner failed to keep adequate records and negligently failed to report income. We will grant respondent's motion for summary judgment to sustain the adjustments to income and addition to tax and penalties determined in the notice of deficiency. An appropriate order and decision will be entered.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011