Sam E. Scott - Page 16

                                                    - 16 -16                                                      

                    The amount of any distribution to a taxpayer from a qualified                                 
             pension plan described in section 401(a) generally is includable in                                  
             gross income in the year of distribution.  Sec. 402(a)(1).  Such                                     
             distribution includes the outstanding balance of any loan at the                                     
             time of the beneficiary's separation from service or default on the                                  
             note.  Murtaugh v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-319; see also                                       
             Minnis v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 1049, 1056 (1979); Dean v.                                           
             Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-226.  However, if a portion of the                                     
             amount distributed is rolled over to another qualified pension plan                                  
             within 60 days following receipt of the distribution, that portion                                   
             is not includable in gross income in the year of distribution.                                       
             Sec. 402(a)(5).                                                                                      
                    If the taxpayer fails to roll over distributed funds within 60                                
             days, and the distribution is made before the date the taxpayer                                      
             attains the age of 59-1/2, and none of the other exceptions in                                       
             section 72(t)(2) applies, the tax on the distribution is increased                                   
             by an amount equal to 10 percent of the portion includable in gross                                  
             income.  Sec. 72(t).                                                                                 
                    Petitioner was 54 years old at the time he received his                                       
             distribution from Heidelberg & Woodliff's salary reduction plan; he                                  
             did not roll over such funds into another qualified plan.  See                                       
             Rodoni v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 29, 32-34 (1995); Clark v.                                          
             Commissioner, 101 T.C. 215, 224-225 (1993).  He unquestionably                                       
             received and negotiated the $36,424.07 distribution check from                                       





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011